當(dāng)前位置：法律圖書館>>法治動(dòng)態(tài)>>期刊目錄>>《法學(xué)雜志》2012年第一期目錄與摘要

《法學(xué)雜志》2012年第一期目錄與摘要

http://m.ggmww.com　 2012-7-24 14:56:02　 來(lái)源：中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)網(wǎng)

1.、王軼教授
【摘要】 <正>王軼,男,1972年6月生,河南南陽(yáng)人,蒙古族�，F(xiàn)為中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師,擔(dān)任中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院副院長(zhǎng)、中國(guó)人民大學(xué)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院副院長(zhǎng)、教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地-中國(guó)人民大學(xué)民商事法律科學(xué)研究中心副主任,兼任中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)民法學(xué)研究會(huì)副秘書長(zhǎng)
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)； 研究基地； 蒙古族； 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)； 河南南陽(yáng)； 副院長(zhǎng)； 科學(xué)重點(diǎn)； 法學(xué)院； 博士生導(dǎo)師； 人文社會(huì)；
 
 

2.、我國(guó)刑事訴訟制度的進(jìn)步與發(fā)展——2011年《刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》評(píng)介  樊崇義（中國(guó)政法大學(xué)）;
【摘要】 2011年8月通過(guò)初審并公布于眾、征詢意見的《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法修正案》(草案)中對(duì)證據(jù)概念與種類所做的變化、對(duì)證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的進(jìn)一步明確與完善以及非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的確立等內(nèi)容充分表明我國(guó)刑事證據(jù)制度有了巨大的進(jìn)步與發(fā)展。與此同時(shí),修正案還對(duì)辯護(hù)制度、刑事強(qiáng)制措施以及偵查程序等方面的刑事訴訟制度做了改革與完善。誠(chéng)然,修正案中有些刑事制度的改革依然存在不盡如人意之處,如非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則,但是必須要說(shuō)明的是修正案中所做的有關(guān)刑事訴訟制度的改革在一定程度上集中反映了我國(guó)刑事訴訟制度的進(jìn)步與發(fā)展。
【Abstract】 "Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law (draft)" in August 2011 has been made public by the trial. The concepts and types of evidence have been made many changes in this amendment. At the same time the amendment makes further to clarify and improve the standard of proof, and establish the rule excluding illegally obtained evidence. All of the reforms show the criminal evidence system has got tremendous progress and development. The amendment also made some reform and improvements on the defense system, criminal investigation procedures, enforcement measures and other aspects of the criminal system. Frankly speaking, there are still some defects in this amendment, such as the illegal evidence exclusion rules. However we must recognize that the amendments made in the reform of the criminal system to some extent, has focused our criminal system progress and development.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 刑事訴訟法修正案； 進(jìn)步； 發(fā)展； 證據(jù)； 辯護(hù)； 偵查；
【Key words】 criminal procedure amendment progress developing evidence defend investigation；
 
 
 

3.、監(jiān)視居住制度評(píng)析——以2011年《刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》為視角  李鐘;劉浪 （浙江省寧波市北侖區(qū)人民檢察院）;
【摘要】 2011年《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱《修正案草案》)充分注意到了現(xiàn)行監(jiān)視居住制度在實(shí)施過(guò)程中所暴露出的問(wèn)題,并對(duì)監(jiān)視居住制度進(jìn)行了一系列的改造�！缎拚�案草案》的立法初衷是將監(jiān)視居住確立為一種減少羈押的替代性措施,但具體的條文設(shè)計(jì)卻使監(jiān)視居住制度產(chǎn)生了內(nèi)部的分裂。在嫌疑人、被告人自己住所執(zhí)行的監(jiān)視居住可以被認(rèn)為是一種非羈押性的強(qiáng)制措施,但指定居所的監(jiān)視居住顯然已成為一種羈押性的強(qiáng)制措施。因此,為了防止權(quán)力的濫用和充分保障嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán),對(duì)指定居所的監(jiān)視居住需要進(jìn)行更為嚴(yán)格的審查與控制。具體的審查、控制方法可以參照對(duì)逮捕的審查、控制方法,同時(shí)也需要確立對(duì)其進(jìn)行定期羈押必要性審查的制度。另外還需確立錯(cuò)誤指定居所監(jiān)視居住的國(guó)家賠償制度作為最后一道"防線"。
 
【Abstract】 "The Amendment Of Criminal Procedural Law (Draft)"(hereinafter referred to as the "Draft")is fully aware of problems of the current system of residential surveillance exposed in the implementation process, and undertakes a series of major transformations to the system. The original legislative intention of the Draft is to achieve the reduction of unnecessary pretrial detention. But the specific provision design obviously makes internal divisions in the system of residential surveillance. Suspects and defendants under surveillance in their own domicile can be thought of as a non-custodial measure, but the designated residential surveillance has clearly become a custodial measure. Therefore, in order to prevent the abuse of power and to guarantee human rights, there is the need of a tight legal control for the designated residential surveillance. The methods of surveillance can refer to methods of arrest, but it is also necessary to establish the periodic investigation system of detention. As a last line of defense, the system of the state compensation also needs to be established if error designated surveillance occurs.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》； 監(jiān)視居��； 立法完善；
【Key words】 amendment of criminal procedural law (draft) residential surveillance legislation perfection
 
 
 

4.、沉默權(quán)之賦予與證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之轉(zhuǎn)型  楊文革（南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 口供之必取是支撐我國(guó)"符合說(shuō)"之證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理論成立的關(guān)鍵。在賦予被追訴者沉默權(quán)之后,我國(guó)的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必將面臨轉(zhuǎn)型。對(duì)于那些被追訴者不予供述的案件,應(yīng)當(dāng)實(shí)行內(nèi)心確信的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn);對(duì)于那些被追訴者自愿供述的案件,可實(shí)行高度蓋然性的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 更多還原
【Abstract】 Statements of support for our country must take is "consistent with that" proof of the key to the establishment of the standard theory. In the defendants′ right to remain silent after being given, the standard of proof will face China′s transformation. For those who are not statements of prosecution cases, the heart should be confident that the implementation of standards; prosecution for those who voluntarily confessed to be the case, can exercise a high degree of probability standard of proof.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 口供； 沉默權(quán)； 證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)； 內(nèi)心確信； 高度蓋然性；
【Key words】 statement silence standard of proof heart sure high degree of probability； 
 

5.、新自由主義、金融危機(jī)與金融監(jiān)管體制之變革  楊松;張永亮（遼寧大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 新自由主義理念支配下的華爾街金融創(chuàng)新日新月異,金融市場(chǎng)"高度繁榮"。受此影響,監(jiān)管領(lǐng)域出現(xiàn)了反監(jiān)管思潮,其邏輯后果便是市場(chǎng)與政府(監(jiān)管)出現(xiàn)雙重失靈,金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)并蔓延。美國(guó)金融監(jiān)管權(quán)力配置的欠缺導(dǎo)致監(jiān)管沖突與監(jiān)管真空;監(jiān)管成本與監(jiān)管收益不匹配;監(jiān)管部門組成人員配置不合理。在全球金融體制風(fēng)云變幻的今天,汲取美國(guó)教訓(xùn)、完善我國(guó)金融監(jiān)管體制應(yīng)重點(diǎn)關(guān)注:信守保護(hù)投資者和消費(fèi)者之市場(chǎng)永恒價(jià)值真諦;建立宏觀審慎監(jiān)管體制以應(yīng)對(duì)系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn);通過(guò)內(nèi)部控制與外部監(jiān)管,完善金融機(jī)構(gòu)治理;構(gòu)建對(duì)監(jiān)管者之"監(jiān)管"制度;重點(diǎn)監(jiān)管民間金融和影子銀行系統(tǒng)。
【Abstract】 Under the neoliberalism, the Wall Street experienced changing financial innovation and high prosperity of financial market. Under its influence, the idea of deregulation has risen in the regulation area, which has resulted in double failures in market and government regulation, the outburst and spread of financial crisis. Deficiency of US financial regulation power distribution has led to conflict and vacuum of regulation, disproportion between regulation cost and regulation benefit, illogicality of manpower disposition in regulating agency. With the daily changing of global financial system, we should learn a lesson from the United States to perfect our national financial regulation system. The emphases are to abide by the permanent values in the market of protecting the investor and consumer, to build a general and prudent regulating system to address systemic risk, to improve financial institutions management through internal control and external regulation, to construct an oversight system aimed at regulators, and to put focus on regulation of civilian financial system and shadow banking system.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 新自由主義； 金融危機(jī)； 金融監(jiān)管；
【Key words】 neoliberalism financial crisis reform of financial supervision system；
 

6.、社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)的動(dòng)力分析  付子堂;陳仲（西南政法大學(xué)）;
【摘要】 "依法治國(guó),建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家"是我國(guó)現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)的一個(gè)重要目標(biāo),同時(shí)也是一項(xiàng)艱巨而又復(fù)雜的系統(tǒng)工程。如何充分調(diào)動(dòng)各方面的積極力量,形成合力,是我們應(yīng)該思考而又必須解決的重要課題。從馬克思主義哲學(xué)的視角看,社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)的動(dòng)力可以分為原動(dòng)力在于人的需要,根本動(dòng)力在于社會(huì)基本矛盾運(yùn)動(dòng)規(guī)律,直接動(dòng)力在于理論引領(lǐng)與權(quán)力推動(dòng)。
 
【Abstract】 "Managing a country by law, building a socialist the rule of law country’s one of important modernization construction targets, but also a difficult and complex system engineering. How to fully mobilize all positive forces to form a cohesive force, we should ponder over and solve an important issue. From view of Marxism Philosophy, the construction of socialist rule of law can be divided into motive power lies in the person′s need; the basic reformative motivation rule of social basic contradiction; Direct power lies in the theoretical guide and power boost.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 法治； 社會(huì)主義法治建設(shè)； 動(dòng)力；
【Key words】 rule of law the construction of socialist rule of law power；
 

7.、食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪探析  儲(chǔ)槐植;李莎莎（北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院） ;
【摘要】 食品是人類生活的基本需求之一。民以食為天,而食又以安為先。近些年來(lái),我國(guó)食品安全事件頻發(fā),違法犯罪猖獗,《刑法》保護(hù)不力。為此,《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法修正案(八)》第49條增設(shè)食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪,以嚴(yán)厲打擊食品領(lǐng)域的瀆職行為,強(qiáng)化國(guó)家的監(jiān)管責(zé)任。本文就食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪增設(shè)的必要性、法條的解讀以及與相關(guān)罪名的區(qū)分進(jìn)行探析,以期能對(duì)司法實(shí)踐有所裨益。
【Abstract】 Food is one of the basic needs of human life. The People take the basis on food, while security takes the precedence of food. In recent years, the food safety accidents happened frequently, food safety crimes are rampant, and Criminal Law protection is not enough. Therefore, Article 49 in Amendment(Ⅷ) to the Criminal Law of the P.R.C. adds the crime of malfeasance in food regulation in order to combat malfeasance in food industry and strengthen state supervision duty. This paper makes a research on necessity of adding the crime of malfeasance in food regulation, explanation of law items, difference between the crime of malfeasance in food Regulation and related accusations, which may give the benefit to application of the accusation in judicial practice.
【關(guān)鍵詞】 食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪； 必要性； 法條解讀； 相關(guān)罪名；
【Key words】 crime of malfeasance in food regulation necessity explanation of law items related accusation；
 

8.、在我國(guó)建立以“假釋為主、減刑為輔”的罪犯出獄新模式  劉強(qiáng)（上海政法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 我國(guó)重減刑、輕假釋的現(xiàn)狀源于刑法規(guī)定中的邏輯悖論,由此影響了減刑假釋制度對(duì)罪犯更新改造、重返社會(huì)、預(yù)防和減少重新犯罪、降低刑罰成本功能的有效發(fā)揮,影響了假釋的廣泛適用,不利于監(jiān)獄和社會(huì)秩序的穩(wěn)定。我國(guó)應(yīng)適當(dāng)降低假釋標(biāo)準(zhǔn),提高減刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以此來(lái)完善我國(guó)的減刑假釋制度。
【Abstract】 In China, the actuality of attaching importance to reduction of sentence but belittling parole results from logical paradox in Criminal Law. It influences the system of reduction of penalty and parole′s function in rehabilitation and reform of criminals, helping them return to society, preventing from and reducing re-offence and reducing the cost of penalty. It also influences the wide application of parole, and is unfavorable to the stability of prison′ order and social order. From the perspective of legislation, this article brings forward the idea of appropriately reducing the standard of parole and enhancing the standard of reduction of penalty.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 假釋為主； 減刑為輔； 調(diào)整減刑假釋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)； 罪犯出獄新模式；
【Key words】 parole principally reduction of penalty secondly adjust the standard of reduction of penalty and parole new model of criminal′s being released from prison；
 

9.、信用本質(zhì):經(jīng)濟(jì)要求權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)——基于全球金融危機(jī)的反思  李曉安（首都經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 肇端于2007年初的美國(guó)次級(jí)抵押房貸危機(jī)以難以預(yù)料的方式迅速、廣泛、深刻地影響整個(gè)世界的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、以至思想。金融衍生產(chǎn)品的極度擴(kuò)張與發(fā)展,不僅使監(jiān)管者、中介機(jī)構(gòu)和投資者都陷入風(fēng)險(xiǎn)定價(jià)迷失之中,更因?yàn)樵谖�機(jī)鏈條環(huán)節(jié),不斷創(chuàng)造出來(lái)的金融衍生產(chǎn)品將法律關(guān)系中的信用主體模糊,使得虛擬經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下的信用比照實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)中信用構(gòu)成要素發(fā)生很大變化。傳統(tǒng)的信用學(xué)說(shuō)并沒(méi)有將股權(quán)與信用相聯(lián)系,而在現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)中,資本市場(chǎng)的重要性及其信用問(wèn)題使股權(quán)與信用關(guān)系極為密切。隨著現(xiàn)代信息技術(shù)的發(fā)展,知識(shí)已經(jīng)成為資本、生產(chǎn)要素的組成部分,"敏捷制造"等新型的生產(chǎn)方式使得傳統(tǒng)的價(jià)值鏈構(gòu)成發(fā)生了重大變革,將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)納入信用的研究范圍探討并揭示經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)信用本質(zhì)具有重要意義。
【Abstract】 The U.S. subprime mortgage crisis which started from the early of 2007, quickly, extensively and profoundly affects the world′s economic, politics and even the thoughts in unexpected ways. The extreme expansion and development of financial derivatives, not only made the regulators, intermediaries and investors lost into the risk-based pricing, but also made the subject of credit uncertain and the credit in virtual economic conditions greatly changed in the constituent elements because of the chain links in the crisis, financial derivatives which was continuously created. The traditional theory of credit does not link the shareholders′ rights with credit, but in the modern economic society, the importance of capital market and credit problems make shareholders′ rights connecting with credit closely. As the development of modern information technology, knowledge has become the composition of capitals, production factors, "agile manufacturing" and other new mode of production have made the traditional value chain undergoing major changes. It is important to put intellectual property right in the scope of the research of credit and reveal economic and social credit essence.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 信用； 構(gòu)成要素； 內(nèi)涵發(fā)展； 信用本質(zhì)； 經(jīng)濟(jì)要求權(quán)；
【Key words】 credit elements development of meaning essence of credit right of economic claims；
 

10.、論質(zhì)量法學(xué)學(xué)科的創(chuàng)建  何永軍（昆明理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 質(zhì)量法學(xué)是研究廣義的質(zhì)量法律制度、質(zhì)量法律現(xiàn)象以及與質(zhì)量法律相關(guān)諸問(wèn)題及其規(guī)律的一門新興學(xué)科。質(zhì)量法學(xué)不但具有自身獨(dú)特的研究對(duì)象,而且還具有自身獨(dú)立的研究問(wèn)題,故從學(xué)科劃分的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)看其完全能夠成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科。中國(guó)目前創(chuàng)建質(zhì)量法學(xué)的主客觀條件已基本成就,創(chuàng)建質(zhì)量法學(xué)正逢其時(shí)。質(zhì)量法學(xué)必將是一門具有廣闊發(fā)展前途的學(xué)科,我們應(yīng)加強(qiáng)其相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)理論的研究。
【Abstract】 Quality Jurisprudence is a new subject which studies the generalized quality of legal system, the quality of legal phenomena and the various issues with quality of laws. Quality Jurisprudence not only has its own unique object of study, but also has its own independent research questions, so it will become an independent Subject from the standards of Subject division. Subjective conditions and objective conditions which found Quality Jurisprudence has been basically achieved in China , creating quality legal has a good chance. Quality Jurisprudence is a subject with broad developed prospects, for which we need to strengthen the related basic research.
【關(guān)鍵詞】 質(zhì)量興國(guó)； 質(zhì)量法學(xué)； 學(xué)科；
【Key words】 quality jurisprudence subject；
 
11、《法國(guó)民法典》規(guī)定的準(zhǔn)侵權(quán)行為辨析  羅結(jié)珍（北京第二外國(guó)語(yǔ)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 我國(guó)一些學(xué)者認(rèn)為《法國(guó)民法典》的侵權(quán)行為一般條款是第1382條,第1383條是對(duì)第1382條的補(bǔ)充,而第1384條是對(duì)準(zhǔn)侵權(quán)行為的概括性規(guī)定。這一評(píng)介存在明顯錯(cuò)誤。實(shí)際上,第1383條才是《法國(guó)民法典》有關(guān)準(zhǔn)侵權(quán)行為的一般規(guī)定。
【Abstract】 In China, some scholars hold that the general provision of delict stipulated in French Civil Code is Article 1382. Article 1383 is the supplement to Article 1382, and Article 1384 is the generalized (summarized) provision of quasi-delict. This comment is totally (obviously) wrong. In fact, unintentional delict stipulated in Article 1383 is the general provision of quasi-delict in French Civil Code.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 法國(guó)民法； 準(zhǔn)侵權(quán)行為；
【Key words】 french civil law quasi-delict；
 
12、民間資本運(yùn)行的危機(jī)透視與法制思考  楊積堂（北京聯(lián)合大學(xué)運(yùn)用文理學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 近來(lái)民間資本運(yùn)行的亂象頻現(xiàn),凸顯民間資本運(yùn)行之危機(jī)。本文通過(guò)當(dāng)前發(fā)生的民間資本運(yùn)行中的典型個(gè)案,透視民間資本運(yùn)行的混亂的現(xiàn)象、根源及危害,揭示民間資本運(yùn)行中法律機(jī)制的缺失和監(jiān)督機(jī)制的失靈,在此基礎(chǔ)上,思考探索如何為民間資本運(yùn)行構(gòu)建良性的法律保障機(jī)制。
【Abstract】 Disordered phenomenon in operation of nongovernmental capital has frequently occurred in recent years, which brings out the clues of operation crisis in nongovernmental capital. This paper is to examine the disordered phenomenon, source and harm existing in the operation crisis of nongovernmental capital and to reveal the failure in supervision mechanism as well as the loss in legal mechanism. On the basis, how to establish the healthy legal guarantee mechanism for nongovernmental capital operation is explored in this paper.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 民間資本； 運(yùn)行； 危機(jī)； 法制思考；
【Key words】 operation of nongovernmental capital crisis legal thinking；
 
13、我國(guó)商法的核心價(jià)值:邏輯展開與實(shí)踐應(yīng)用  王建文（中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 總綱性規(guī)范的缺失以及以之為載體的商法核心價(jià)值的模糊是我國(guó)商事司法實(shí)踐中法律適用困境的重要原因。為使我國(guó)商法理論研究與商事立法、司法等實(shí)務(wù)活動(dòng)獲得確定的價(jià)值指引,有必要對(duì)我國(guó)商法核心價(jià)值的邏輯展開及實(shí)踐應(yīng)用進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究。商法的核心價(jià)值曾被普遍界定為效率或效益,但基于正本清源,應(yīng)將其界定為自由,其內(nèi)容主要表現(xiàn)為強(qiáng)化私法自治與經(jīng)營(yíng)自由。商法中自由價(jià)值的邊界應(yīng)立足于秩序價(jià)值進(jìn)行界定。在商事立法、監(jiān)管及審判活動(dòng)中,應(yīng)立足于自由與秩序的平衡,使商法核心價(jià)值的得到合理應(yīng)用。
【Abstract】 The major causes of the plight of law application in Chinese business judicial practice include the lack of the general rule and the mistiness of business law’s core value by the carrier of the general rule. To guide the theoretical research of Chinese business law and practical activities such as legislation and justice of business definitely, it is necessary to research systematically the logic expansion and practical application of the core value of Chinese business law. The core value of business law had been generally defined as efficiency or benefit. However, with the purpose of radically reform, it should be defined as freedom which manifests in strengthening the autonomy of private law and the freedom of operation. The boundary of freedom value in the business law should be based on the order value. In the activities of legislation, regulation and trial of business, the balance of freedom and order should be based on to make the core value of business law to be applied reasonably.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 商法核心價(jià)值； 自由； 秩序； 邊界； 平衡；
【Key words】 the core value of business law freedom order boundary balance；
 
14、行政權(quán)濫用的預(yù)測(cè)與防范  崔卓蘭;杜一平（吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 行政主體面對(duì)在執(zhí)法中潛在的隱患和未來(lái)的不利因素時(shí),因缺乏較好的認(rèn)知意識(shí)和防范機(jī)制,在面對(duì)權(quán)力欲、金錢欲和物質(zhì)欲望的刺激時(shí)容易喪失免疫力,導(dǎo)致以權(quán)謀私、權(quán)錢交易等為求利益而濫用行政權(quán)的問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生。行政權(quán)濫用嚴(yán)重干擾了經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)的健康發(fā)展,阻礙了國(guó)家法治目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。行政權(quán)濫用具有事先預(yù)防的可能性,本文以政府自身建設(shè)為基點(diǎn),通過(guò)對(duì)執(zhí)法程序中可能存在行政權(quán)濫用的環(huán)節(jié)進(jìn)行事前預(yù)測(cè)和分析,提出了科學(xué)有效的事前防范與控制機(jī)制,以此作為實(shí)現(xiàn)依法行政的制度保障。
【Abstract】 When the administrative agencies face the latent dangers and coming disadvantageous factors with law enforcement, due to the worse cognition and prevention system, and the worship for power, money and material, tend to depart from principle,problems of abusing of authority for personal gains will easily occur,with the exchange of right and money, whereas, it has the possibilities for the administrative agencies to take precautions against the abuse of authority in advance. This paper bases on the government self-improvement, predicts and analyses problems of authority abuse during the enforcement, proposes a scientific and effective precaution and control mechanism, to achieve security supervision system of law-based administration.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 行政執(zhí)法； 權(quán)力濫用； 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)測(cè)； 防范機(jī)制；
【Key words】 administration powers abuse of authority forecast risk precaution mechanism；
 
15 、我國(guó)引航法律制度研究  張麗;王秀芬（大連海事大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 引航,舊稱引水、領(lǐng)港、領(lǐng)江,是指在一定的引航區(qū)域內(nèi)(港口或內(nèi)河),專門性的從業(yè)人員(即引航員)登上船舶,為船舶指引航向,把船舶安全地引進(jìn)、帶出港口或在港內(nèi)移泊。引航是一種資源,具有公益性和主權(quán)性。引航的目的不是為了盈利,而是提供公共服務(wù)。由于港口的航道條件構(gòu)成了一個(gè)國(guó)家的天然屏障,事關(guān)一國(guó)的國(guó)防,因而按照國(guó)際慣例,引航員必須由本國(guó)人擔(dān)任,并且對(duì)出入港口的外國(guó)籍船舶實(shí)行強(qiáng)制引航。這是一個(gè)國(guó)家引航權(quán)的體現(xiàn),是國(guó)家主權(quán)的一部分。本文針對(duì)我國(guó)引航體制改革,結(jié)合國(guó)際相關(guān)立法,對(duì)我國(guó)引航法律制度所涉及引航管理體制模式、引航機(jī)構(gòu)資質(zhì)管理、引航員資質(zhì)管理以及引航作業(yè)中法律責(zé)任加以研究。
【Abstract】 Pilotage is defined that a pilot is on board a vessel and helps the master navigate the vessel to protect the vessel put in or put out a port safely. The pilotage is a kind of resource and it presents the sovereignty of the state. The goal of the pilotage is not for gainings, but it is for providing common service. Because a port is a national bar of a country, according to international rules, a pilot must be a citizen of the state. The pilotage is forcible for a foreign vessel. The thesis focuses on the system reformation on the pilotage of China. Coming together international relative legislation the writer proposes some advices on the pilotage legal system in China.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 引航； 引航員； 引航權(quán)； 引航區(qū)； 強(qiáng)制引航；
【Key words】 pilotage pilot the power of pilotage the scope of piloage forcible pilotage；
 
16 、論制止危害中國(guó)海洋領(lǐng)土安全活動(dòng)的法律對(duì)策  盛紅生（浙江理工大學(xué)法政學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 近年來(lái),中國(guó)海洋領(lǐng)土安全受到各種危害活動(dòng)的嚴(yán)重威脅,主要表現(xiàn)在釣魚島及其附屬島嶼和南沙群島部分島礁被外國(guó)非法占領(lǐng),在專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)以及專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)上空針對(duì)中國(guó)的外國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)明顯增多等等。因此,為了持續(xù)宣示中國(guó)對(duì)被外國(guó)占領(lǐng)的島礁的主權(quán),應(yīng)通過(guò)特別立法建立巡航制度,派遣軍艦前往我被占領(lǐng)土地區(qū)巡航,在時(shí)機(jī)成熟時(shí)收復(fù)島礁并實(shí)行有效控制;借助國(guó)內(nèi)立法明確中國(guó)政府在"專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)軍事活動(dòng)"問(wèn)題上的立場(chǎng),針對(duì)不同性質(zhì)的活動(dòng)適用不同的規(guī)則;建立"防空識(shí)別區(qū)"防止針對(duì)中國(guó)的外國(guó)軍用飛機(jī)飛越專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)上空。我們的立場(chǎng)、觀點(diǎn)和主張應(yīng)借助國(guó)內(nèi)立法確定下來(lái),為將來(lái)解決國(guó)際爭(zhēng)端主張我方權(quán)利時(shí)提供有力證據(jù)。
【Abstract】 In recent years, detrimental acts by foreign States have imposed critical threat to marine territory security of China, such as dozens of islands of China in Nansha regions are occupied unlawfully by other States, and increasing military operations by foreign States in waters and in space above China’s economic exclusive zone are prominent as well.It is necessary to conduct marine patrols in occupied area in accordance with domestic legislations, so as to keep proclaiming China’s sovereignty over these islands, and furthermore, to retrieve the islands and carry out effective control if possible. By municipal legislation, it should be clarified China’s position concerning foreign military operations in our economic exclusive zone, and apply various rules to the operations concerned based on their nature, and moreover, Air Defense Identification Zone should be established to suppress flight targeting at China by foreign military aircrafts through space above China’s economic exclusive zone. It is conducive to crystallize our position and appeals by municipal legislation as soon as possible, to provide legal evidence to justify our right in case international dispute would be settled by judicial approach in the future.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)； 海洋防務(wù)安全； 法律對(duì)策；
【Key words】 exclusive economic zone marine defense legal solutions；
 
17 、論我國(guó)代表人訴訟制度正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)的應(yīng)然選擇——美國(guó)集團(tuán)訴訟的歷史考察與現(xiàn)代啟示  曹偉 （北京師范大學(xué)）;
【摘要】 意思自治與集體主義的沖突自始自終貫穿于集團(tuán)訴訟歷史發(fā)展的全過(guò)程。共同利益理論、同意理論以及實(shí)體理論則是學(xué)界為緩解這一沖突而提出的對(duì)策。實(shí)體理論既克服了共同利益理論在方法論假定上的缺陷,也可以克服同意理論在事實(shí)假定上的不足,是我國(guó)構(gòu)建代表人訴訟制度正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ)的最佳選擇。
【Abstract】 The individual autonomy′s conflict with collectivism has been throughout the development of U.S. class action. In order to de-escalate the conflict, the American legal scholarship offered Common Interest Theory, Consent Theory and Substantive Theory as solutions. Substantive Theory overcomes the Common Interest Theory′s defect in methodology and the Consent Theory′s defect in factual assumptions, and therefore is the best choice of justification of representative litigation in China.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 集團(tuán)訴訟； 共同利益理論； 同意理論； 實(shí)體理論；
【Key words】 class action common interest theory consent theory substantive theory；
 
18 、孫中山的法治理想與現(xiàn)實(shí)困境  馬建紅（山東大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 作為中華民國(guó)的締造者,建立真正主權(quán)在民的民主共和國(guó),實(shí)現(xiàn)約束和限制公權(quán)力以保障人民的權(quán)利和自由的法治理想,貫穿于孫中山先生整個(gè)革命生涯中。在革命處于低潮時(shí)期,孫中山就開始思考通過(guò)約法以預(yù)防軍政府對(duì)人民權(quán)利的侵奪;辛亥革命后又寄希望于《臨時(shí)約法》的責(zé)任內(nèi)閣制來(lái)防止袁世凱的復(fù)辟;北洋軍閥混戰(zhàn)時(shí)期的孫中山,又設(shè)計(jì)一個(gè)訓(xùn)政階段以訓(xùn)練民眾學(xué)會(huì)使用"四權(quán)",以此實(shí)現(xiàn)普遍的守法和良法之治。然而這些法治理想在與現(xiàn)實(shí)相遇后,卻表現(xiàn)出一種無(wú)力感,甚至引導(dǎo)現(xiàn)實(shí)走向了理想的反面。孫中山先生所面臨的世紀(jì)難題,也應(yīng)引起當(dāng)代人的警醒與反思。
【Abstract】 Being the founder of the Republic of China, the ideal of building a democratic republic state by restraining and limiting the public authority to protect the people′s right and liberty reflected Mr. Sun Yat-sen′s whole revolutionary life. When the revolution went into a hard period, Sun Yat-sen tried to prevent the military government from depriving the people′s rights by the provisional constitution, after the Revolution of 1911, he placed his hope on the responsible cabinet system of The Interim Constitution of the Republic of China to avoid Yuan Shih-kai′s restoration, during the fighting among the Northern Warlords, Sun Yat-sen planned the Political Tutelage to train the people to use "four powers," thus, the people could realize the observance of the law and self-government under the law. However, when this ideal was put into practice, it turned out to be powerless, even leading the reality to the opposition of the ideal. The problem that Mr. Sun Yat-sen met also calls for modern people′s awakenings and reflections.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 孫中山； 法治理想； 約法之治； 《臨時(shí)約法》訓(xùn)政；
【Key words】 Sun Yat-sen ideal of rule of law the rule of provisional constitution the interim constitution of the Republic of China political tutelage；
 
19 、中華法系的原生形態(tài)、發(fā)展軌跡和基本特征  武樹臣（山東大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 古史傳說(shuō)時(shí)代的東夷民族,不僅發(fā)明了最初的法律制度,還釀造了豐富的法律觀念,這些內(nèi)容構(gòu)成了中華法系的原生形態(tài)。中華法系自西周至唐代基本形成。西周法律的總體精神是禮而宏觀樣式是判例法。戰(zhàn)國(guó)秦朝確立了集權(quán)政體和"成文法"同時(shí)開始將禮局部成文法化。漢代開始了儒法互補(bǔ)、禮法結(jié)合并初建"混合法"樣式�！短坡墒枳h》標(biāo)志著成文法對(duì)禮的全面吸收以及律與例的結(jié)合。這標(biāo)志著中華法系發(fā)展到巔峰。中華法系的基本特征是倫理主義精神和成文法與判例、法律規(guī)范與非法律規(guī)范相結(jié)合的"混合法"。
【Abstract】 Dongyi nationality created not only original legal institutions, but also profuse notions of law, which constituted the prototype of Chinese legal system. Chinese Legal System had taken shape basically in Tang dynasty. The total spirit of Western Zhou′s law was Li, and macroscopical style of which was the case law. In Chan Kuo and Qin Dynasty, the centralized regime and the statute law had been established, and in the meantime Li was converted into the statute partly. The Han Dynasty began to promote the combination of Li and law, and formed the mixed-law. "The Tang law dredges opinion"indicated the all-sided combination of Li and law, Lv and Li(case),which meant the top development of Chinese legal system. The ethicality and the mixed-law, which combined the statute law and the case law, legal norms and other norms, are the basic spirit of Chinese legal system.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 中華法系； 東夷； 仁禮； 律刑；
【Key words】 Chinese legal system dongyi ren Li Lv；
 
20 、論法院執(zhí)行權(quán)力的分解  徐振華;俞榮根（西南政法大學(xué)）;
【摘要】 傳統(tǒng)執(zhí)行體制下執(zhí)行權(quán)的運(yùn)行模式存在重大缺陷,導(dǎo)致近年來(lái)法院執(zhí)行系統(tǒng)的違法違紀(jì)現(xiàn)象層出不窮。原因之一,在于傳統(tǒng)執(zhí)行體制下執(zhí)行權(quán)力過(guò)于集中,其配置和運(yùn)行不科學(xué)。在現(xiàn)有體制框架下,分解法院執(zhí)行權(quán)并致其相互制衡是可供優(yōu)先選擇的一條路徑。法院的執(zhí)行權(quán)可一分為四:執(zhí)行調(diào)查權(quán)、執(zhí)行實(shí)施權(quán)、執(zhí)行裁決權(quán)、執(zhí)行監(jiān)督權(quán)。
【Abstract】 There are significant shortcomings in implementation of enforcement power under the system of traditional mode of operation,leading to the phenomenon of unlawful in courts in recent years. One of the reasons is the too concentrated enforcement power under the traditional system of implementation. Its configuration and operation is unscientific. Under the existing institutional framework, decomposition of enforcing rights of the courts is a preferred path. Court′s enforcement powers can be divided into four parts:right of investigations, implementation of the right, right of Adjudication, right of supervision. We want to provide help for the improvement of people’s courts .
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 執(zhí)行權(quán)； 權(quán)力分解； 執(zhí)行體制；
【Key words】 enforcement powers power decomposition system of enforcement；
 
21 、建立我國(guó)案例指導(dǎo)制度的困境和出路——以刑事案例為例  舒洪水（西北政法大學(xué)） ;
【摘要】 案例指導(dǎo)制度是一項(xiàng)既區(qū)別于英美法系判例法制度又不同于大陸法系判例制度的中國(guó)特色產(chǎn)物,是我國(guó)司法觀念變革與制度變革相結(jié)合的一項(xiàng)新制度,是一種能夠體現(xiàn)中國(guó)特色、并順應(yīng)世界兩大法系逐漸融合發(fā)展大趨勢(shì)的制度變革措施。本文指出了消除相關(guān)障礙是建構(gòu)案例指導(dǎo)制度的前提,論證了案例指導(dǎo)制度在我國(guó)建構(gòu)的必要性和可行性,同時(shí)從指導(dǎo)案例的選擇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與要求、指導(dǎo)性案例的產(chǎn)生程序、案例指導(dǎo)制度的監(jiān)督機(jī)制、案例指導(dǎo)制度的修繕機(jī)制等四個(gè)角度,提出了構(gòu)建刑事案例指導(dǎo)制度的具體路徑。
【Abstract】 Case guidance system is a Chinese characteristic which is different between common law and case law and judicial precedent system of continental law system. It is a new system that embodies Chinese characteristics and combined by the judicial idea change and system change complied with the world two legal systems gradually shirt-sleeve the development trend. This paper points out that the premise of construction case guidance system is to eliminate related obstacles, demonstrate the guidance system in the case of the construction of necessity and feasibility, put forward the construction of the system of criminal case guidance concrete path from four aspects-guidance case selecting standards and requirements、the generation of guiding case program、case guidance system of supervision mechanism、the case of the guidance system repair mechanism.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 成文法； 案例指導(dǎo)； 案例； 判例；
【Key words】 statutory case guidance case precedent；
 
22、從檢察制度的歷史與比較論我國(guó)檢察官之定位與保障  李美蓉（中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所）;甄貞（北京市人民檢察院）; 
【摘要】 改革開放以來(lái),我國(guó)與國(guó)際社會(huì)交流頻繁,特別是受美國(guó)制度影響,一直有將檢察官行政官化的呼聲。但是,從檢察制度的歷史淵源以及各國(guó)檢察官類型的比較研究可以得知,純粹行政官化的檢察官并不契合我國(guó)社會(huì)。我國(guó)應(yīng)將檢察官定位為司法官,并仿效大陸法系國(guó)家,給予其充分的身份保障。
【Abstract】 Since Reformation and Opening, China has been experiencing more communications to the international community, especially with the US. Therefore there is an argument that the prosecutors of China should be recognized as administrators, learning from the US. However, by analyzing the source and development of prosecution system of main democratic states, it is proved that the prosecutors recognized as administrators do not fit in China. The prosecutors of China should be recognized as legal officials, and the status safeguards should be approved accordingly.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 檢察制度； 歷史與比較； 定位； 保障；
【Key words】 prosecution system history and compare position safeguards；
 
23 、論檢察權(quán)的配置  張鐵英（天津市人民檢察院第二分院）;
【摘要】 檢察權(quán)的本質(zhì)屬性應(yīng)界定為檢察監(jiān)督權(quán),只有弄清楚檢察權(quán)的本質(zhì)屬性,才能明確檢察機(jī)關(guān)的職能定位。檢察權(quán)的配置問(wèn)題的研究,應(yīng)當(dāng)發(fā)軔于國(guó)家權(quán)力的配置的宏觀層面,而落腳在檢察內(nèi)部權(quán)力體系的微觀層面。檢察改革應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循司法規(guī)律,不宜盲目創(chuàng)新求變。 更多還原
【Abstract】 The essence of prosecutorial power is prosecutorial supervision, and function of procuratorate depends on the essence. Research about scheme of prosecutorial power should include scheme of state powers and interior powers of prosecutorial power. Prosecutorial innovation should follow judicial rules, and it is not bright that power is innovated blindly. 更多還原
【關(guān)鍵詞】 檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)； 檢察權(quán)； 性質(zhì)； 職能； 配置；
【Key words】 prosecutorial supervision prosecutorial power function scheme；
 
24 、淺析我國(guó)律師參與非訴訟糾紛解決機(jī)制的困境  張曙（浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)法學(xué)院） ;
【摘要】 我國(guó)律師參與非訴訟糾紛解決機(jī)制尚處于探索階段,目前存在著律師與當(dāng)事人對(duì)ADR的控制權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪、職業(yè)行為規(guī)范不健全、利用率不高等諸多難題。需要引入合作式參與的模式對(duì)律師與委托人的關(guān)系進(jìn)行調(diào)整,確立科學(xué)的職業(yè)行為規(guī)范以維護(hù)ADR的程序正義,建立相關(guān)機(jī)制以進(jìn)一步發(fā)揮律師在化解社會(huì)矛盾中的作用。
【Abstract】 Chinese lawyer′s participation in ADR is still in the exploratory stage. At present, there are many problems in ADR, such as lawyers competing with the parties for control of ADR,imperfect professional regulations, and law-rate utilization of ADR. We need to introduce the mode of cooperation to adjust the relationship between the lawyers and clients, set up the scientific professional regulation to maintain the procedural justice of ADR, and establish relevant mechanism to improve the lawyer’s utilization of ADR.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 非訴訟解紛機(jī)制； 律師參與； 職業(yè)規(guī)范； 利用機(jī)制；
【Key words】 ADR l9awyers′ participation professional regulation use mechanism；
 
25 、從判決書看緩刑的適用  陳華麗（太原科技大學(xué)）;
【摘要】 刑事司法政策、緩刑制度功能、刑法條文規(guī)定、犯罪案件類型及被告人自身情況等都是影響緩刑適用的因素。從判決書反映的情況來(lái)看,不管是基層法院還是中級(jí)法院,故意傷害案件和交通肇事案件緩刑適用率都相對(duì)較高,財(cái)產(chǎn)類犯罪案件則較少適用。在實(shí)踐中,緩刑的適用主要存在對(duì)寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策的把握不準(zhǔn),緩刑監(jiān)督考察機(jī)制不健全等問(wèn)題�？梢钥紤]從這兩方面入手完善我國(guó)的緩刑制度。 更多還原
【Abstract】 Application of probation is influenced by such factors as the criminal justice policy, probation function, the criminal law provisions, crime types and the defendants′ own situation. Reflected from the judgments of both grass-root court and intermediate court, the application rate of probation is relatively high in intentional injury cases and traffic accident cases, while it is low in property crime. In practice, there mainly exists unfaithful grasp of the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency, unsound probation supervision inspection mechanism and so on. Perfecting the system of probation can be started from the above two aspects.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 判決書； 緩刑適用； 因素； 考察監(jiān)督；
【Key words】 judgment application of probation factors community correction；
 
26 、專利侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)囊�件及其舉證責(zé)任——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》為切入點(diǎn)   范曉宇 （中國(guó)計(jì)量學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 專利侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域的證明責(zé)任分配已成為學(xué)界和實(shí)務(wù)的焦點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)之一,專利侵權(quán)損害賠償訴訟舉證責(zé)任的整體研究并不多見。要產(chǎn)生專利侵權(quán)損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán),至少須滿足侵權(quán)人的過(guò)錯(cuò)、侵害專利權(quán)的事實(shí)、損害事實(shí)、因果關(guān)系四個(gè)要件。在舉證責(zé)任分配上,原告應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)創(chuàng)設(shè)請(qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)的法律規(guī)范的事實(shí)要件承擔(dān)證明責(zé)任,而被告對(duì)權(quán)利妨礙、權(quán)利消滅和權(quán)利受制規(guī)范的事實(shí)要件承擔(dān)證明責(zé)任。專利侵權(quán)損害賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)各構(gòu)成要件事實(shí)的證明,應(yīng)根據(jù)專利權(quán)及專利侵權(quán)的特點(diǎn),依據(jù)《專利法》等實(shí)體法的規(guī)定具體確定。
【Abstract】 The burden of proof in patent infringement has become one of the difficult problems of academics and practitioners. In order to generate a claim of patent infringement damages, it should meet at least the following four elements: the fault of the infringer, the fact of patent infringement, damage facts, and causation. About the allocation of the burden of proof, the plaintiff should burden the facts about the creation of claims, and the defendant should burden the facts about the right to prevent, eliminate rights norms and rights restricted. The constituent elements to claim for patent infringement should be based on the characteristics of patents and patent infringement, "Patent Law"and other specific provisions of substantive law.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 專利侵權(quán)賠償； 要件； 舉證責(zé)任；
【Key words】 patent infringement constitutive requirement burden of proof；
 
27 、反思與重構(gòu):我國(guó)商業(yè)秘密立法之完善  袁荷剛（中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)） ;
【摘要】 商業(yè)信息只有符合商業(yè)秘密的構(gòu)成要件時(shí),才能受到法律的保護(hù)。如何認(rèn)定權(quán)利人主張的商業(yè)秘密是否存在容易產(chǎn)生爭(zhēng)議。我國(guó)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》中關(guān)于商業(yè)秘密構(gòu)成要件的規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)刪除"實(shí)用性"要件,以采取合理措施的程度作為評(píng)價(jià)"合理性"的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),同時(shí)商業(yè)秘密的保護(hù)范圍不應(yīng)僅僅限定為"技術(shù)信息或商業(yè)信息"。
【Abstract】 Business Information can only be protected by law when it follows elements of trade information constituent. How to identify the protection on existence of trade secrets is argued for its controversial disputes. China′s "Anti-Unfair Competition Law"should delete "practical"elements from provisions of elements on trade secrets to take reasonable measures for evaluating the degree of Rationality"standard, while the scope of protection of trade secrets should not be limited to only"technical information or business information.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 商業(yè)秘密； 構(gòu)成要件； 立法完善；
【Key words】 trade secrets elements legislation improvement；
 
28 、經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任的實(shí)現(xiàn)與公訴權(quán)的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型  劉擁（湖南大學(xué)法學(xué)院）; 
【摘要】 經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任有著自己獨(dú)特的形態(tài)以及責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式,經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任的實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制主要是行政執(zhí)法機(jī)制和訴訟機(jī)制,公益訴訟符合經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任社會(huì)性的要求,與經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任的實(shí)現(xiàn)之間具有天然的契合性。傳統(tǒng)公訴權(quán)在我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期被認(rèn)為專指"刑事公訴權(quán)",客觀上阻卻了現(xiàn)代公訴權(quán)的拓展。隨著現(xiàn)代法律對(duì)國(guó)家和社會(huì)公共利益保護(hù)的加強(qiáng),傳統(tǒng)公訴權(quán)制度日顯單薄和不足。因此,建構(gòu)現(xiàn)代公訴制度不僅是公訴權(quán)在具體制度中的應(yīng)用和拓展,而且更加有利于強(qiáng)化檢察機(jī)關(guān)法律監(jiān)督職能,進(jìn)而更好地保護(hù)國(guó)家和社會(huì)公共利益,維護(hù)社會(huì)公平正義,有效實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)法責(zé)任。
【Abstract】 Economic law liability has its own unique form and bearing mode, its major realization mechanisms are administrative enforcement mechanism and litigation mechanism. Public welfare litigation meets the requirements of socialization of Economic law liability, which is naturally compatible with realization of economic law liability. Traditional public prosecution power has been considered as "criminal public prosecution power", so it has objectively blocked expansion of modern public prosecution power. As modern law strengthens protection for state interest and public interest, traditional public prosecution institution appears flimsy and insufficient day by day. Therefore constructing modern public prosecution institution is not only application and expansion of public prosecution power in concrete institution, but also further favourable to strengthening legal supervision of procuratorate, safeguarding state interest and public interest, defending social equity and justice, and effectively realizing economic law liability.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 經(jīng)濟(jì)法； 責(zé)任； 公訴權(quán)； 現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型；
【Key words】 economic law liability public prosecution power modern transition；
 
29 、論船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)與海事賠償責(zé)任限制的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)  徐仲建 （清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)與海事賠償責(zé)任限制之間發(fā)生沖突,既有歷史原因又有現(xiàn)實(shí)原因。船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)和海事賠償責(zé)任限制發(fā)生沖突的領(lǐng)域是船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)優(yōu)先保障實(shí)現(xiàn)的限制性海事債權(quán)�！逗Ｉ谭ā芬�(guī)定海事賠償責(zé)任限制優(yōu)先于船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)實(shí)施以協(xié)調(diào)兩者之間的沖突,其理論根據(jù)在于:船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)系擔(dān)保物權(quán),而海事賠償責(zé)任限制是確定海事債權(quán)數(shù)額的一種制度,擔(dān)保物權(quán)只有在確定債權(quán)數(shù)額后才能實(shí)現(xiàn)。
【Abstract】 There are some historical and realistic causes for the conflict between Maritime Liens and Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims. The claims subject to limitation secured by Maritime Liens are the object of the conflict between Maritime Liens and Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims. CMC stipulates that Maritime Liens shall not affect the implementation of Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, which harmonizes the relationship between them. The regulation is based on the theory that Maritime Liens, as a real right for security, are subordinated to the claims, the amount of which is decided by Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 船舶優(yōu)先權(quán)； 海事賠償責(zé)任限制； 擔(dān)保物權(quán)；
【Key words】 Maritime Liens Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims the Real Right for Security；
 
30 、論WTO“公共道德例外”條款下之“域外管轄”  徐莉（長(zhǎng)江理工大學(xué)文法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 有關(guān)WTO"公共道德例外"條款下"域外管轄"問(wèn)題的爭(zhēng)議由來(lái)已久,并伴隨著域外管轄措施在實(shí)踐中的廣泛應(yīng)用而益發(fā)激烈。對(duì)此,DSB欠缺有效的回應(yīng),依據(jù)《維也納條約法公約》規(guī)定的解釋方法亦無(wú)法獲知準(zhǔn)確答案,文末依據(jù)國(guó)際法上對(duì)于四大管轄權(quán)原則的具體設(shè)置推知:對(duì)于侵犯基本人權(quán)等有違公共道德的行為,各國(guó)方可行使域外管轄權(quán)。 更多還原
【Abstract】 The disputes about the "extraterritoriality"in WTO "public morals exception"have existed for a long time, and become more intense with the extraterritorial measures widely application in practice. The DSB lacked effective response to it and there was also no accurate answer. And according to the interpretation, it means regulated in Vienna Convention in the Law of Treaties. It can be inferred from the principles of jurisdiction that countries can exercise jurisdiction on some basic human rights violations against public moral.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 公共道德例外； 域外管轄； 管轄原則；
【Key words】 public moral extraterritoriality principles of jurisdiction；
 
31 、美國(guó)納稅人訴訟原告資格的主要影響因素分析及其對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示  李炎（中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;
【摘要】 事實(shí)上的損害、分權(quán)原則和聯(lián)邦主義是影響美國(guó)納稅人訴訟原告資格的三個(gè)主要因素。盡管一直沒(méi)有形成系統(tǒng)而完整的納稅人訴訟原告資格理論,而且美國(guó)聯(lián)邦法院和地方法院在實(shí)踐中的做法也不盡一致,但在我國(guó)當(dāng)前對(duì)納稅人訴訟的相關(guān)理論研究和制度構(gòu)建方興未艾的情境下,深入分析影響美國(guó)納稅人訴訟原告資格的主要因素,對(duì)于構(gòu)建我國(guó)納稅人訴訟,尤其是作為其前提的原告資格理論具有重要的借鑒意義。 更多還原
【Abstract】 Injury in fact, separation of powers and federalism are main factors that affect the standing of taxpayers′ lawsuit in U.S. Although there has not been a systematic and complete theory of taxpayers′ standing, and U.S. Federal Court and District Court deal with it differently in practice. Studying deeply the main factors affecting the standing of taxpayers′ lawsuit in U.S. is very important to establish our theory and system of taxpayers′ lawsuit, especially that of plaintiffs′ standing, as its premise, for reference, while we are doing more and more research on theory and system of taxpayers′ lawsuit.
 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 納稅人訴訟； 原告資格； 影響因素； 啟示；
【Key words】 taxpayers′ lawsuit plaintiffs′ standing affecting factors inspiration；
 

日期：2012-7-24 14:56:02 | 關(guān)閉 |  分享到：