當(dāng)前位置：法律圖書館>>法治動(dòng)態(tài)>>期刊目錄>>《法學(xué)論壇》2012年第四期目錄與摘要
《法學(xué)論壇》2012年第四期目錄與摘要
http://m.ggmww.com 2012-7-26 14:48:47 來源：中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)網(wǎng)
1.三網(wǎng)融合視野下刑事立法的調(diào)整方向（于志剛 中國(guó)政法大學(xué) 刑事司法學(xué)院，北京 100088）
摘要：三網(wǎng)融合的趨勢(shì)引發(fā)了“三屏合一”。網(wǎng)絡(luò)與屏幕的融合雖然給我們的生活帶來極大的便利，但是新的犯罪類型的出現(xiàn)，犯罪模式由“一對(duì)一”向“一對(duì)多”的轉(zhuǎn)變，也給傳統(tǒng)刑法理論、刑事立法和司法帶來極大的挑戰(zhàn)。采用傳統(tǒng)的思路對(duì)于刑法規(guī)范的擴(kuò)張解釋并不能從根本上解決問題，傳統(tǒng)犯罪的整體異化更需從刑事立法層面上進(jìn)行積極回應(yīng)。
關(guān)鍵詞：三網(wǎng)融合；計(jì)算機(jī)犯罪；網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪；擴(kuò)張解釋；三屏合一
Subject:The Adjust Direction of Criminal Legislation under the Perspective of Network Convergence
Author & unit:YU Zhigang (China University of Political Science and Law, BeiJing 100088,China)
Abstract：The network convergence led “three screen in one”, which has brought great convenience to our lives. However, the new types and new patterns of crime also bring special challenges to the criminal law theory, the criminal legislation and the judicial. The traditional idea of amplified interpretation does not solve the problem fundamentally, so the positive response to the alienation of traditional crime should on the level of criminal legislation.
Key words：network convergence;cybercrime;amplified interpretation;three screen syncretism
2.以刑罰威嚇誹謗、詆毀、謠言？——論刑罰權(quán)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)有害信息傳播的干預(yù)程度（時(shí)延安 中國(guó)人民大學(xué) 刑事法律科學(xué)研究中心，北京 100872）
摘要：網(wǎng)絡(luò)有害信息傳播行為，應(yīng)根據(jù)法治精神進(jìn)行規(guī)制。對(duì)于不同類型的傳播行為，應(yīng)根據(jù)針對(duì)對(duì)象及其利益的不同加以區(qū)分對(duì)待。運(yùn)用刑罰權(quán)來懲罰傳播網(wǎng)絡(luò)有害信息的行為人，應(yīng)充分考慮刑罰權(quán)出現(xiàn)的正當(dāng)性問題。只有給客觀的、受法律確認(rèn)或者為公序良俗所認(rèn)可的利益造成損害或者可能造成損害的情況下，刑罰權(quán)出現(xiàn)才可能具有正當(dāng)性。遏制網(wǎng)絡(luò)有害信息傳播，應(yīng)特別注意與保障言論自由的平衡。
關(guān)鍵詞：網(wǎng)絡(luò)有害信息；刑罰權(quán)出現(xiàn)；正當(dāng)性；言論自由
Subject:Deterring the Defamation, Humiliation, Rumor with Criminal Penalty?——The Intervention of Criminal Justice on the Dissemination of Deleterious Information on Web
Author & unit:SHI Yan’an(Law School, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
Abstract：To regulate the dissemination of deleterious information on web should be under the spirit of rule of law. Deferent types of disseminating behaviors should be treated by different ways according to who they affect and whose interests will be violated. The issue of legitimacy of the power of criminal penalty should be considered in the intervention of such power on the dissemination of deleterious information. Only when a objective interest protected by law or recognized by the public is harmed or seriously dangered by such information, the appearance of the power of criminal penalty could be legitimate. The liberty of speech should be guaranteed in the process of the intervention of such power.
Key words：deleterious information on web; appearance of the power of criminal penalty; legitimacy； liberty of speech
3.網(wǎng)絡(luò)背景下刑事立法的修正（鄭延譜 北京師范大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，北京 100875）
摘要：網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界具有虛擬性、公開性等特點(diǎn)，雖不能獨(dú)立于現(xiàn)實(shí)世界，但也有自身的特點(diǎn)。單純通過解釋傳統(tǒng)刑法條文，已無法規(guī)制和懲罰網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪，宜采用“漸進(jìn)的立法方式”對(duì)現(xiàn)行刑事立法進(jìn)行修正。本文建議，應(yīng)對(duì)公私財(cái)物進(jìn)行擴(kuò)大性解釋，將虛擬物納入刑法的調(diào)整范圍；承認(rèn)片面共犯的存在，以適應(yīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪公開性、跨國(guó)界的特點(diǎn)；調(diào)整刑事管轄的原則，參加雙邊及國(guó)際條約，加強(qiáng)國(guó)際司法協(xié)助以應(yīng)對(duì)日益猖獗的網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪。
關(guān)鍵詞：網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪；虛擬性；片面共犯；財(cái)物
Subject:The Revision of Criminal Law in Perspective of Cybercrimes
Author & unit:ZHENG Yanpu（Law School， Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
Abstract：The cyber world, independent of real world, is fictitious and open, which makes it has its own characteristic. As it is hard to regulate and punish cybercrimes only by interpreting traditional articles, it is better to revise criminal law by way of “gradual litigation”. The measures are as follows: to protect virtual objects by criminal law by broadly interpreting property; to introduce the theory of “One-sided accomplice” into criminal law while cybercrimes are always open and transnational; to adjust the principle of criminal jurisdiction, to participate bilateral and international treaties, to strengthen international judicial assistance, thus to strike the Increasingly rampant cybercrimes.
Key words：cybercrime；fictitiousness；one-sided accomplice；property
4.區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化法制研究的參照系（葉必豐 上海交通大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，上海 200240）
摘要：對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化中法制問題研究的科學(xué)性，取決于研究方法即參照系選擇的科學(xué)性。我國(guó)已有研究的參照系，主要有國(guó)際私法和歐盟方案以及美國(guó)州際法治協(xié)調(diào)方案。但是，從參照系功能與所需要解決任務(wù)的一致性、參照系環(huán)境的相同性和所堅(jiān)持理念的先進(jìn)性來說，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)選擇美國(guó)的州際法治協(xié)調(diào)為研究參照系。這一參照系以尊重現(xiàn)行憲政框架，通過法解釋挖掘法律資源為核心，是我們研究區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化中法制問題的首選方案。在法解釋得以充分展開，成文法資源得以窮盡挖掘的基礎(chǔ)上，區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的制度需求仍得不到滿足的，我們完全可以像西班牙那樣制定統(tǒng)一的成文法。
關(guān)鍵詞：區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化；法制協(xié)調(diào)；美國(guó)州際法治協(xié)調(diào)；參照系；法解釋
Subject:The Frame of Reference for Legal Study of Regional Economic Integration
Author & unit:YE Bifeng(Law School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240,China) Abstract：The Scientificity of the legal research in regional economic integration depends on its researching method, which is the scientificity of how to choose a frame of reference. The now existing frames of reference include international private law scheme, the European Union scheme and the Inter-State legal coordination scheme in the U.S. Nevertheless, the Inter-State legal coordination scheme shall be our best choice for many reasons, like the consistency of the function of the frame of reference with the tasks waiting for accomplishment, the environmental similarities of the frame of reference, and the advancement of the conceptions. The Inter-State legal coordination scheme focuses on respecting the current constitutional framework, and taking full advantage of legal resources by law interpretation. Therefore, it shall be our preferred scheme when researching legal issues in regional economic integration. If the systematic needs still could not be satisfied on condition of fully use of law interpretation and exhausting utilization of written law resources, we could certainly enact a unified statute like what Spain has done.
Key words：regional economic integration; legal coordination; the frame of reference; law interpretation
5.分權(quán)、政府間競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展——概念、邏輯及其批評(píng)（程金華 華東政法大學(xué) 國(guó)際金融法律學(xué)院，上海 201620）
摘要：在過去的30多年，包括中國(guó)在內(nèi)的許多國(guó)家都存在通過中央分權(quán)地方政府以促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的潮流。對(duì)相關(guān)理論和實(shí)踐的研究變得日益重要，其內(nèi)容包括梳理分權(quán)的概念與類型，探究分權(quán)促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的理論邏輯及其思想根源，以及評(píng)析分權(quán)研究中可能存在的方法論問題。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，盡管分權(quán)改革得到了世界銀行在內(nèi)的國(guó)際組織與許多學(xué)者的支持，但目前對(duì)于分權(quán)能否真正通過引入地方競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制來保護(hù)市場(chǎng)并推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的長(zhǎng)久發(fā)展并無定論。包括“市場(chǎng)保護(hù)型聯(lián)邦制”在內(nèi)的諸多分權(quán)理論普遍存在對(duì)市場(chǎng)建設(shè)的制度環(huán)境進(jìn)行過度假設(shè)的問題，如此分權(quán)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展之間的因果關(guān)系被或多或少地扭曲了。
關(guān)鍵詞：分權(quán)；地方競(jìng)爭(zhēng)；聯(lián)邦制；市場(chǎng)建設(shè)；經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展
Subject:Decentralization, Intergovernmental Competition, and Economic Growth: A critical review
Author & unit:CHENG Jinhua （East China University of Political Science,Shanghai 201620,China）
Abstract：There has been an increasing interest in promoting decentralization research and reform in the last three decades all over the world. This essay reviews this academic and practical tendency critically. It clarifies the definition and classification of decentralization, examines historical and theoretical origins of modern proposition of decentralization for economic growth, and points out many potential methodological problems in the contemporary literature of decentralization reform. This review finds that while decentralization reform has been widely supported by scholars, politicians, and international organizations (such as the World Bank), whether decentralization is truly able to promote long-term economic growth through introducing intergovernmental competition is empirically inconclusive. In the contemporary studies of decentralization for economic growth, including the famous thesis of “market-preserving federalism,” students make too many strong institutional assumptions to find right causation between decentralization and economic growth.
Key words：decentralization; intergovernmental competition; federalism; market building; economic growth
6.論跨地區(qū)水生態(tài)補(bǔ)償?shù)姆ㄖ茀f(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制——以新安江流域生態(tài)補(bǔ)償為中心的思考（徐 鍵 上海財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，上海 200433）
摘要：跨地區(qū)水生態(tài)補(bǔ)償，以受益者負(fù)擔(dān)為原則，是流域下游水生態(tài)受益地區(qū)向流域上游水生態(tài)保護(hù)建設(shè)地區(qū)實(shí)施補(bǔ)償?shù)囊环N活動(dòng)。它旨在通過利益驅(qū)動(dòng)機(jī)制、激勵(lì)機(jī)制和協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制，協(xié)調(diào)地區(qū)之間的生態(tài)保護(hù)和利益沖突，最終實(shí)現(xiàn)保護(hù)生態(tài)的共同目的。作為跨域治理的具體形態(tài)，跨地區(qū)水生態(tài)補(bǔ)償主要有支配性治理和區(qū)域合作治理兩種模式。在實(shí)踐中，基于執(zhí)行落差和實(shí)施范圍的限制，支配性治理模式并不高效；由于利益的高度分化，區(qū)域合作治理模式同樣面臨諸多現(xiàn)實(shí)困難。新安江流域生態(tài)補(bǔ)償機(jī)制融合了區(qū)域合作的自愿要素和來自中央政府的執(zhí)行強(qiáng)制要素，展示了一種新的有效的跨地區(qū)水生態(tài)補(bǔ)償法制協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。
關(guān)鍵詞：生態(tài)補(bǔ)償；區(qū)域合作；財(cái)政轉(zhuǎn)移支付；法制協(xié)調(diào)
Subject:Legal Coordination Mechanism for the Eco-compensation of Across Boundaries
Author & unit:XU Jian (Law School, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)
Abstract：On the basis of beneficiary-pay principle, the eco-compensation of across boundaries means, the area of ecological protection gains compensation from the area of ecological benefit. The purpose of the eco-compensation is, coordinating the interest conflict between different areas and realizing the common objectives of ecological protection, with the interest drive mechanism, incentive mechanism and coordination mechanism. As an concrete form of governance across boundaries, the eco-compensation of across boundaries has two different model: dominating governance and regional cooperative governance. In practice, the implementation of these two models is not efficient. The eco-compensation mechanism of Xinanjiang River, combines the governance elements of voluntary and mandatory, and displays an effective legal cooperation mechanism of eco-compensation.
Key words：eco-compensation; regional cooperation; financial transfer payment; legal coordination
7.論我國(guó)憲法與社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系建設(shè)——尋找當(dāng)代中國(guó)的共識(shí)基礎(chǔ)（李炳輝，周葉中武漢大學(xué) 政治與公共管理學(xué)院，湖北武漢 430072；武漢大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，湖北武漢 430072）
摘要：社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系建設(shè)是當(dāng)代中國(guó)的一項(xiàng)重要時(shí)代課題，其目的即在全社會(huì)中構(gòu)建起一種全新的時(shí)代共識(shí)。而要構(gòu)建起這種共識(shí)，則需要通過憲法之實(shí)施加以實(shí)現(xiàn)。憲法中所體現(xiàn)的共識(shí)是社會(huì)價(jià)值的基礎(chǔ)，我國(guó)現(xiàn)行憲法中的大量規(guī)范本身也與社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值相互重合，更重要的是，唯有實(shí)現(xiàn)憲法中所體現(xiàn)的諸多價(jià)值，社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系才會(huì)具有牢固的基礎(chǔ)。因此，憲法實(shí)施是社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系建設(shè)的必由之路。
關(guān)鍵詞：社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系；憲法共識(shí)；憲法價(jià)值；憲法實(shí)施。
Subject:On the Construction of Socialist Core Value System about China’s Constitution
Author & unit:Li Binghui,ZHOU Yezhong(Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China)
Abstract：The construction of the socialist core value system is an important subject of today in modern China, whose purpose is to structure a new contemporary consensus in the whole society. This consensus should be realized by the implementation of constitution. The consensus which implicated in constitution is the base of social values, and a lot of constitutional norms themselves are consistent with socialist core value. More importantly, only the realization of several constitutional values can provide a firm foundation for the construction of the socialist core value system. Therefore, the implementation of constitution is essential for the construction of the socialist core value system.
Key words：the socialist core value system; constitutional consensus; constitutional values; the implementation of constitution
8.論作為基礎(chǔ)區(qū)分概念的營(yíng)利（李政輝 浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院 法學(xué)院，浙江杭州 310018）
摘要：社會(huì)科學(xué)的研究范式從“國(guó)家——社會(huì)”兩分法轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)椤皣?guó)家——公民社會(huì)——市場(chǎng)”三分法，這對(duì)法律提出巨大的轉(zhuǎn)軌制度需求，營(yíng)利是區(qū)分三者的關(guān)鍵線索。營(yíng)利內(nèi)涵具有三方面：作為目的的營(yíng)利、作為過程的營(yíng)利與作為結(jié)果的營(yíng)利，包含了主客觀兩方面的內(nèi)容。用營(yíng)利內(nèi)涵解析各主體，可區(qū)分為國(guó)家是絕對(duì)的非營(yíng)利，公民社會(huì)是相對(duì)的非營(yíng)利，而市場(chǎng)則是典型的營(yíng)利。法律制度應(yīng)做出系統(tǒng)性回應(yīng)，以營(yíng)利作為主體的區(qū)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
關(guān)鍵詞：營(yíng)利；營(yíng)利內(nèi)涵；法律主體分類
Subject:On Profit, as A Fundamental Divisive Concept
Author & unit:LI Zhenghui（Law School， Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018 China)
Abstract：The research paradigm of social science has changed from dichotomous of “Country-Society” to tracheotomy of “Country-Civil Society-Market”, which puts forward to the transformation of Legal System. Profit is the key concept to distinguish the organizations existing in Country, Civil Society and Market. The connotation of profit has three aspects: the profit purpose, the profit activities and the profit distribution that has integrated content including subjective and objective meanings. Using the connotation of profit to analyze the different sections, Country is the absolute non-profit, Civil Society as relative non-profit and Market as typical profit. Basing on such classification, the Legal System should give systematic response, applying profit as standard to the organizations.
Key words：profit; connotation of profit; classification of legal organizations
9.論我國(guó)著作權(quán)法律制度的內(nèi)部協(xié)調(diào)（劉 潔 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院 法學(xué)所，北京 100720）
摘要：我國(guó)著作權(quán)法律體系中鄰接權(quán)區(qū)別于著作權(quán)而存在，但二者的權(quán)利對(duì)象區(qū)分模糊，引起我國(guó)著作權(quán)法律制度內(nèi)部的不協(xié)調(diào)。鄰接權(quán)與著作權(quán)兩者區(qū)分的根源在于版權(quán)體系與作者權(quán)體系認(rèn)定作品所采用的獨(dú)創(chuàng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一致。以獨(dú)創(chuàng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為最終著眼點(diǎn)，鄰接權(quán)與著作權(quán)權(quán)利對(duì)象屬性具有高度的統(tǒng)一性。
關(guān)鍵詞：權(quán)利對(duì)象；獨(dú)創(chuàng)性；內(nèi)部協(xié)調(diào)
Subject:On the Interal Coordination of Our Copyright Legal System
Author & unit:LIU Jie（Post-doctoral Station，Chinese Academy of Social Sciences，Beijing 100720，China）
Abstract：In China’s copyright legal system, neighboring rights exsit which are different from the copyright. But both right objects can’t be distinguished clearly. It causes the copyright legal system incoordinate. In this paper, after analysizing the legal relationship of copyright and neghboring rights, it is thought that two of them are distinguished because the material difference original standard of work in copyright system and the author right system . Regarding the original standard as the final point, the paper demonstrates that the objects’ attribute of copyright and neghboring rights could be unity.It is profitable to coordinate copyright legal system.
Key words：right objects; originality; interal coordination
10.利益衡量及其理論的反思——一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)分析的視角（張偉強(qiáng) 山東大學(xué)威海分校 法學(xué)院，山東威海 264209）
摘要：利益衡量理論指出，法官裁判中存在實(shí)質(zhì)性判斷且也應(yīng)該進(jìn)行利益衡量，但它卻未能對(duì)如何進(jìn)行實(shí)質(zhì)裁量提供有效的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與知識(shí)。相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)或理論不但不具有可操作性，且遮蔽了問題的本原，容易使法官陷入“左右為難”的困境，做出錯(cuò)誤的選擇。與之相對(duì)，經(jīng)濟(jì)分析理論卻有助于幫助法官將實(shí)質(zhì)裁量的依據(jù)集中到不同選擇的一般性社會(huì)后果上，且為后果的預(yù)測(cè)及評(píng)價(jià)提供了更為有效的知識(shí)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
關(guān)鍵詞：利益衡量；經(jīng)濟(jì)分析； 法官裁量；司法理論
Subject:An Economic Introspection on Interest Balancing and It’s Theory
Author & unit:ZHANG Weiqiang(Law School, Shandong University at Weihai, Weihai Shandong 264209,China)
Abstract：The interest balancing theory points out that the judge has to do substantive discretion and should also do some interest balancing in some cases. But this theory couldn’t provide effective standards and knowledge for substantial discretion. The relevant standards or theory not only lack the maneuverability, but also shield the truth. It could lead judge to be in a dilemma and make wrong choices. In contrast, economic analysis can help judge to consider different general social consequences of different choices, and provide more effective knowledge and standards to predict and evaluate the consequences.
Key words：interest balancing; economic analysis; judge discretion; judicial theory
11.“臨終關(guān)懷”的法律之維——法理基礎(chǔ)、憲法依據(jù)與實(shí)體法規(guī)制（尤金亮 安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué) 人文學(xué)院，安徽合肥 230032）
摘要：臨終關(guān)懷是對(duì)臨終病人進(jìn)行姑息性照護(hù)，而非治療性照護(hù)，關(guān)注的是如何減少臨終病人痛苦，不以延長(zhǎng)生命為主要目的�，F(xiàn)代人權(quán)理念的內(nèi)在要求、社會(huì)契約論對(duì)弱勢(shì)群體的當(dāng)然保護(hù)、法的效益價(jià)值的現(xiàn)實(shí)體現(xiàn)，是臨終關(guān)懷正當(dāng)性的法理基礎(chǔ)。臨終關(guān)懷具有充分的憲法依據(jù)。臨終關(guān)懷必須依法進(jìn)行，以確�；颊叩臋�(quán)利不被剝奪。在刑法上，臨終關(guān)懷屬于“正當(dāng)行為”，但要防止以臨終關(guān)懷為理由而實(shí)施的遺棄罪和不作為形式的故意殺人罪，同時(shí)防范其他犯罪。在民法上，要規(guī)范臨終關(guān)懷的決定主體、實(shí)施條件和操作程序。
關(guān)鍵詞：臨終關(guān)懷；法理基礎(chǔ)；憲法依據(jù)；實(shí)體法保障
Subject:Viewpoint of Law on Hospice—— the Jurisprudence Basis, Constitutional According and Substantive Law Regulating of Hospice
Author & unit:YOU Jinliang(Law Department, Anhui Medical University, HeFei AnHui 230032,China)
Abstract：Hospice is a form of medical treatment which provide the patients with palliative care, rather than therapeutic care, and focused on how to reduce pain, rather than prolonging life . The inherent requirement of modern human rights idea, the properly protection for the vulnerable groups according to The Social Contract theory, and the beneficial value of law are the jurisprudence of hospice . Hospice has fully constitutional basis. Hospice must be operated legally in order to ensure the right of the patients. In criminal law, hospice belongs to “proper behavior”, but we must prevent crimes of abandonment and the crime of homicide of negative form in the disguise of hospice, and prevent other crimes which maybe happened in the operation of hospice . In civil law, we should regulate decision subject , implement conditions and operating procedures of hospice.
Key words：hospice; Legal basis; Constitutional basis; Substantive law guarantee
12.利用影響力受賄罪若干問題解讀（楊俊 華東政法大學(xué) 博士后流動(dòng)站，上海 200042）
摘要：《刑法》第388條之一是關(guān)于利用影響力受賄罪的規(guī)定，該法條來源于《刑法修正案（七）》第13條之增設(shè)性規(guī)定，旨在從嚴(yán)預(yù)防和懲治賄賂犯罪。尤其是針對(duì)以往不具有國(guó)家工作人員身份的人[JP2]（主要是國(guó)家工作人員的“身邊人”以及離職的國(guó)家工作人員和他們的“身邊人”等）索取或收受賄賂后因懲處缺位而借以逃脫法律制裁的狀況，立法上作出了相應(yīng)的改進(jìn)。然而，在增設(shè)了利用影響力受賄罪這一罪名后，必須考慮其與原有的賄賂犯罪罪刑體系如何銜接與協(xié)調(diào)，特別是有必要對(duì)該罪的罪名確定、主體范圍、行為特征以及司法適用等問題進(jìn)行深刻地解讀。[JP]
關(guān)鍵詞：《刑法》第388條之一；利用影響力受賄罪；罪名確定；主體范圍；行為特征；司法適用
Subject:The Decoding about Some Problems on Bribery Crime of Influence
Author & unit:YANG Jun（East China University of Political Science and Law，ShangHai 200042，China）
Abstract：The article 388 of the penal code is a legal provision about bribery crime
of influence，this legal provisions root in the incremental stipulation of the article 13 of the amendment Ⅶ to the criminal law，which wish to preventing and punishing bribe crimes sharply. Especially this legal provisions is directed against the status that those non-governmental office-holders（some “people around governmental office-holders” and leaving state personnel and people around them）are running away from justice after they asking for bribe or taking bribe owing to the vacancy of legal system，there are improvements on legislatives accordingly. However，it should be thought over bribery crime of influence join and coordinate with other bribe crimes after augmenting the charge. It’s necessary that decoding charge definition，subject scope，behavioral feature and judicial application on bribery crime of influence deeply.
Key words：the article 388 of the penal code；bribery crime of influence；charge definition；subject scope；behavioral feature；judicial application
13.土地征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)解讀——兼論《物權(quán)法》第42條第2款及第132條之適用（郭繼 淮陰師范學(xué)院 法學(xué)院，江蘇淮安 223300）
摘要：現(xiàn)行法律未分別規(guī)定集體土地所有權(quán)及土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，給《物權(quán)法》第42條第2款及第132條的適用帶來了困惑。出于多方面因素考慮，集體土地征收應(yīng)采取“二元化”的補(bǔ)償模式；基于法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析，在未設(shè)置土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的假設(shè)下，集體土地所有權(quán)征收應(yīng)以其市場(chǎng)交易的均衡價(jià)格作為補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；家庭土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)征收應(yīng)分別采用年平均產(chǎn)值、失地農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)業(yè)培訓(xùn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、居民社會(huì)保障標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，作為其收入、就業(yè)及社會(huì)保障效用減損的補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；其他土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)征收應(yīng)以延期收益損失作為補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；分別考量未設(shè)置土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的集體土地所有權(quán)征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，即可確定已設(shè)置土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)的集體土地所有權(quán)之征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
關(guān)鍵詞：集體土地所有權(quán)；土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)；征收補(bǔ)償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)
Subject:The Compensation Standard of Land Expropriation Law Economics Analysis——on the “property law” in forty-second paragraphs 2 and132shall apply
Author & unit:GUO ji(Law school，Huaiyin Normal University，Huaian Jiangsu 223300，China)
Abstract：The current law does not stipulate the collective land ownership and management right of the contracting of land collection compensation standard, to the “property law” in forty-second paragraphs 2 and132of the applicable brought bewilderment. Because of many factors, the collective land requisition should take “two parts” compensation model based on the analysis of law and economics; not set, the land contract management right under the assumption of the ownership of collective land expropriation, shall be based on the market equilibrium price as compensation standard; the family contracted management rights in the land expropriation should be respectively using the annual average value job training standards, farmers, social security of dweller standard as their income, employment and social security function impairment compensation standards; other contractual operation right of land expropriation should be deferred loss of revenue as compensation standards; were considered not set the contractual operation right of land collective ownership of land expropriation compensation standard and the contracted management rights in the land expropriation compensation standard, are determined to set the land contracting management right of land collective ownership acquisition compensation standard.
Key words：collective ownership of land; right to contract for management of land expropriation compensation standard; law and economics
14.農(nóng)村住房及宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)制度研究（毛維國(guó) 山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué) 馬克思主義學(xué)院，山東泰安 271018）
摘要：農(nóng)村住房及宅基地的問題是“三農(nóng)”研究的重要課題。長(zhǎng)期以來，農(nóng)民房屋私人所有與宅基地使用權(quán)集體所有的矛盾十分突出，農(nóng)村住房及宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)限制問題一直未能得到有效解決，造成住房及宅基地資源大量浪費(fèi)，嚴(yán)重影響了農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。因此，加強(qiáng)農(nóng)村住房及宅基地制度改革與創(chuàng)新，建立有效的農(nóng)村住房及宅基地流轉(zhuǎn)機(jī)制，對(duì)于加快農(nóng)村和諧發(fā)展和城鄉(xiāng)一體化進(jìn)程具有重要意義。
關(guān)鍵詞：農(nóng)村；住房；宅基地；流轉(zhuǎn)制度；權(quán)能
Subject:Studies on the Houses of Village and Exchange System of Housing
Author & unit:MAO Weiguo (Shandong Agricultural University, Taian Shandong,271018，China)
Abstract：The problems of the houses of village and the housing constitute a major subject of the village’ three problems. A number of houses and housing have been wasted due to a long strong contradiction between the belongings of the private houses and the collective housing, never resolving the problems of the houses of village and the housing, affecting the development of village’s economy seriously. So,it is an important meaning to reform and create a new system of houses and housing of the villages, establish the houses of village and exchange system of housing and fasten the harmonious development of the village.
Key words：village；house；housing；exchange system；belongings
15.論因第三人欺詐或脅迫而訂立合同的效力（冉克平 中國(guó)人民大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，北京 100872）
摘要：當(dāng)事人一方因受第三人的欺詐或脅迫，與相對(duì)人所訂立合同的效力，集中地表現(xiàn)為該方當(dāng)事人、相對(duì)人以及第三人之間利益沖突。這里的“第三人”并非當(dāng)事人一方與相對(duì)人以外的任何人，而是受到特定的限制。對(duì)于一方當(dāng)事人受第三人欺詐或脅迫而訂立合同的效力，應(yīng)該采納《荷蘭民法典》所代表的效力模式，以相對(duì)人知道或應(yīng)當(dāng)知道合同一方當(dāng)事人受第三人欺詐或脅迫的事實(shí)，作為合同一方當(dāng)事人撤銷該合同的條件。如果遭受欺詐或脅迫的一方當(dāng)事人受有損失的，可以要求第三人承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任，賠償其全部損失。
關(guān)鍵詞：合同；欺詐；脅迫；第三人；信賴原則;交易安全
Subject:On Due to Fraud or Coercion of a Third Person Entered into Validity of the Contract
Author & unit:RAN Keping(Law School， Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
Abstract：Party due to fraud or coercion of the third person, and the validity of the contract entered into relative concentration of performance for that party, the conflict of interest between the relative and the third person.Where the “third person” is not any person other than the party with the relative, but subject to certain limitations. Validity of the Dutch Civil Code should be adopted for the effectiveness of a party by a third party fraud or duress to enter into a contract on behalf of the mode, the counterpart knows or should know that the party of the contract by a third party fraud or duress fact, as the contract party to revoke the conditions of the contract. If you suffer from fraud or duress a party by the loss, may require the third party assumes the tort liability, and compensation for all losses.
Key words：contract；fraud；coercion；the third person；trust principle；transaction security
16.非法證據(jù)為何難以有效排除——兼及中國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除的未來（郭松 四川大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，四川成都 610064）
摘要：既往的研究太多從非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則粗疏這一制度層面解釋非法證據(jù)難以有效排除的原因，但這并不充分。從結(jié)果層面而言，非法證據(jù)沒有被排除在很大程度上意味著被采納。對(duì)非法證據(jù)難以有效排除的研究必須深入解析法官采納非法證據(jù)的內(nèi)在原因。法官證據(jù)運(yùn)用的形式主義化、刑法的主觀主義傾向以及司法實(shí)務(wù)部門對(duì)證明力規(guī)則的過度追求等因素，是誘發(fā)法官采納非法證據(jù)的重要原因，并由此造成了非法證據(jù)難以有效排除。在非法證據(jù)排除的問題上，我們不能僅限于非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的完善，還需將證據(jù)信息的供給、刑事實(shí)體法的調(diào)整、證明方法的轉(zhuǎn)換以及證據(jù)能力規(guī)則的建設(shè)等均納入視野。
關(guān)鍵詞：非法證據(jù)排除；證據(jù)運(yùn)用的形式主義；刑法的主觀主義；證明力規(guī)則
Subject:Why Illegal Evidence Can Not Be Excluded Effectively——The Future of China’s Illegal Evidence Exclusion
Author & unit:GUO Song（Law School，Sichuan University，Chengdu Sichuan 61004，China）
Abstract：Previous studies mainly explained the reasons why illegal evidence could not be effectively excluded from institutional level of crude illegal evidence exclusion rule. However, the explanations are not sufficient. From the level of results, non-excluded illegal evidence means illegal evidence is adopted to a large extent. Studies on why illegal evidence can not be excluded effectively should deeply analyze the inner reasons why judges adopt illegal evidence. The formalism of evidence use by judges, the subjectivism’s tendency of criminal law, the excessive seeking for probative force rules by substantive justice departments and other factors are the important reasons induce judges to adopt illegal evidence, which results in that illegal evidence is difficult to be excluded effectively. Therefore, as for the regulation of illegal evidence exclusion, we should not only improve illegal evidence exclusion rule, but also consider the supply of evidence information, the adjustment of substantive criminal law, the conversion of proof methods and the construction of evidence capacity rules.
Key words：illegal evidence exclusion；formalism of evidence use；subjectivism of criminal law；probative force rules
17.最高人民法院的司法文件：現(xiàn)狀、問題與前景（黃韜 上海交通大學(xué) 凱原法學(xué)院，上海 200240）
摘要：除了制定司法解釋之外，我國(guó)最高人民法院還通過頒布各種形式的抽象性司法文件來指導(dǎo)甚至約束各級(jí)人民法院的法律適用活動(dòng)，這一方面可以視為最高人民法院試圖在通過低成本的方式來實(shí)現(xiàn)法制統(tǒng)一的目標(biāo)，但其中也蘊(yùn)含著某些阻礙我國(guó)司法體制進(jìn)步的消極因素，因此，需要在司法體制改革的過程中加以關(guān)注并予以有效解決。
關(guān)鍵詞：最高法院；司法文件；司法改革
Subject:The Judicial Document of Chinese Supreme People''s Court: Status, Problems and Prospects
Author & unit:HUANG Tao ( KoGuan Law School，Shanghai Jiao Tong University，Shanghai 200240，China)
Abstract：Besides formulating judicial interpretation, Chinese Supreme People''s Court instructs and even binds the activities of legal application of the courts at all levels by issuing various kinds of abstractive judicial documents. On the one hand, this phenomena can be regarded as an exertion of the Supreme Court to achieve the goal of uniformity of legal system, but on the other hand, some negative factors that impedes the progress of China''s judicial system can also be observed and these factors ought to be concerned and solved effectively in the process of judicial reform.
Key words：chinese supreme people''s court; judicial document; judicial reform
18.檢察機(jī)關(guān)提起民事公益訴訟之權(quán)力解析及程序構(gòu)建（何燕 煙臺(tái)大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，山東煙臺(tái) 264005）
摘要：我國(guó)的檢察權(quán)是一種復(fù)合型的權(quán)力，法律監(jiān)督權(quán)和公訴權(quán)是其最主要的兩種權(quán)能，這兩種權(quán)力在本質(zhì)上存在不可兼容性。檢察機(jī)關(guān)提起民事公益訴訟的權(quán)力源自其公訴職能。檢察機(jī)關(guān)提起民事公益訴訟的制度構(gòu)建應(yīng)該首先在憲法上明確其公訴職能，并以此為據(jù)，在《人民檢察院組織法》和《民事訴訟法》中確定檢察機(jī)關(guān)在民事公益訴訟中的“公訴人”地位，設(shè)置檢察機(jī)關(guān)提起公益訴訟的特別程序。
關(guān)鍵詞：檢察權(quán)；法律監(jiān)督權(quán)；公訴權(quán)；民事公益訴訟；程序構(gòu)建
Subject:The Power analysis on the Prosecution filied Civil Public Interest Litigation and program construction
Author & unit:HE Yan(Law School,Yantai University,Yantai 264005,China)
Abstract：China''s prosecutorial power is a complex type of power.meaning The two main powers is the right of legal supervision and the right of public indictment. but these two powers can not be compatibility in essence. The right of prosecutor organization filed Public interest litigation comes from its’ public indictment power. The system of civil public interest litigation filed by People''s Procurator should make the clear understanding of the indictment functions in the Constitution firstly, and then identified the people''s Procuratorate organization “prosecutor” status and set up the special procedure in “The People''s Procuratorate Organization law” and “Civil Procedure Law” according to this.
Key words：prosecutorial power； the right of legal supervision; public indictment; civil public interest litigation；program construction
19.論過度醫(yī)療侵權(quán)行為及其法律規(guī)制（王安富 大連醫(yī)科大學(xué) 公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院，遼寧大連 116044）
摘要：過度醫(yī)療一般是指，在醫(yī)療過程中，醫(yī)師對(duì)患者的疾病實(shí)施不必要的診療措施，致使患者的醫(yī)療費(fèi)用明顯超過疾病診療實(shí)際需求的醫(yī)療行為或醫(yī)療過程。過度醫(yī)療認(rèn)定的關(guān)鍵，在于把握過度醫(yī)療行為與適度醫(yī)療行為的界限，并且應(yīng)將其與保護(hù)性醫(yī)療和防御性醫(yī)療加以嚴(yán)格區(qū)分。從法律意義上講，過度醫(yī)療是一種發(fā)生在醫(yī)療過程中的特殊民事侵權(quán)行為，是指醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)及其醫(yī)務(wù)人員在醫(yī)療活動(dòng)中，以獲取一定經(jīng)濟(jì)利益為目的，違法實(shí)施不必要的診療從而造成患者明顯人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)損害并應(yīng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)法律責(zé)任的行為。過度醫(yī)療侵權(quán)應(yīng)適用過錯(cuò)推定責(zé)任進(jìn)行歸責(zé)。《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》立法上將過度醫(yī)療的范圍，僅局限在“實(shí)施不必要的檢查”，不足以充分保護(hù)患者的合法權(quán)益，立法上應(yīng)進(jìn)一步做出擴(kuò)充解釋。
關(guān)鍵詞：過度醫(yī)療； 過度醫(yī)療侵權(quán)行為； 法律規(guī)制
Subject:On Excessive Medical Treatment Tort and Its Legal Regulation
Author & unit:WANG Anfu(School of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian Liaoning 116044, China)
Abstract：Excessive medical treatment generally refers to a medical act or process in which the unnecessary diagnosis and treatment measures adopted by doctors on the disease of patients, which consequently causes medical expenses to obviously exceed its actual need. The key of certifying excessive medical treatment lies in a demarcation line between excessive medical treatment and appropriate medical treatment it should be strictly distinguished from protective and preventive medical treatment. Legally, excessive medical treatment is a special civil tort in the process of medical treatment. It is an act in the process of which medical institutions and doctors illegally implement unnecessary diagnosis and treatment measures in order to gain some economic interests, thus causing the obvious damages of patients and their properties for which they are to take legal liabilities. Excessive medical tort is attributed in view of the presumption of fault. In legislation, Tort Liability Law limits excessive medical treatment to “the implementation of unnecessary examinations”, which is not sufficient to protect the legal rights of patients. Accordingly, it deserves extended explanation in legislation.
Key words：excessive medical treatment; excessive medical tort; legal regulations
20.損害賠償額之酌定：基于訴訟公平的考量（黃毅 西南大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，重慶 400715）
摘要：在損害發(fā)生得以證明，但損害大小難以證明或不能證明時(shí)，法院若判決駁回原告訴訟請(qǐng)求，將不符合訴訟公平的要求。為彌補(bǔ)這種因需完全證明帶來的不公平，德日等國(guó)家和地區(qū)在理論上和立法實(shí)踐中確立了法官損害賠償額酌定制度。我國(guó)引進(jìn)該制度時(shí)，在理論上應(yīng)厘清概念的含義應(yīng)為“損害賠償額酌定”而非“損害賠償額認(rèn)定”。在實(shí)踐中，應(yīng)明確該制度的適用要件，并采取合理的酌定方法。
關(guān)鍵詞：損害賠償額酌定；證明度減輕；訴訟公平
Subject:The Discretionary of Damages: A Consideration Based on Fairness of Litigation
Author & unit:HUANG Yi (Law school, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
Abstract：The judge will reject the plaintiffs’ claim because they are difficult or failed to prove the amount of compensation, even though the damage facts are obvious, which is not in accordance with the equity and justice of litigation. To eliminate the problems of unfairness associated with strict proof, Germany, Japan and some other countries have established a system in theory and legislation practice, which the judge has the power to make discretionary awards. We should ascertain the meaning?of the?concept in theory is discretion, not accreditation when the system introduced into China. And the essence of this system should adopt lighten the standard of proof theory. We should clarify applicable condition and adopt proper method in practice.
Key words：Discretionary of damages; Lightening the proof standard; Fairness of litigation
20.調(diào)解興衰與當(dāng)代中國(guó)法院政治功能的變遷——以《最高人民法院工作報(bào)告》（1981年-2010年）為對(duì)象（鄭智航 山東大學(xué) 法學(xué)院，山東濟(jì)南 250100）
摘要：上世紀(jì)80年代以來，中國(guó)調(diào)解制度經(jīng)歷了“著重調(diào)解——自愿調(diào)解——調(diào)解優(yōu)先”的過程。在著重調(diào)解階段，法院具有動(dòng)員人們參與有中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義建設(shè)和法律現(xiàn)代化的進(jìn)程，消解經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展帶來的民眾脫離政治依附性的離心力的政治功能；在自愿調(diào)解階段，法院具有進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)化中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義建設(shè)和法律現(xiàn)代化這一基本方向的政治功能；在調(diào)解優(yōu)先階段，法院具有重新恢復(fù)民眾對(duì)于社會(huì)現(xiàn)代化和法律現(xiàn)代化信心的政治動(dòng)員功能。
關(guān)鍵詞：調(diào)解；法院；政治功能；政治動(dòng)員；法律現(xiàn)代化
Subject:The Ebb and the Flow of Mediate and Changes of the Political Function of People Court Author & unit:ZHENG Zhihang(Law School,Shandong university,Jinan Shandong 250100,China)
Abstract：Since 1980,the mediate system has gone through the process of the ebb and the flow. In the process, at first, court emphasized the function of mediate; Some years past,it has more and more emphasized that people use mediate according to their voluntary. In recent years, it considers that mediate has precedence over judgment. At the first stage, court undertook to mobilize people to participate in the socialist cause and legal modernization. At the second stage, court has the Political Function that it strengthens the basic direction of the socialist cause and legal modernization. At the third stage, court must to resume people’s faith of socialist cause and legal modernization.
Key words：Mediate; Court; Political function; Political mobilize; legal modernization
日期：2012-7-26 14:48:47 | 關(guān)閉 | 分享到：